PhishDestroy Presents

NameSilo Technologies Corp.
[CORRECTED EDITION]

The investor presentation they should have given — with the numbers they left out

CSE: URL · OTC: URLOF 81.5% Dead Domains $50.8M Phantom Profit 4.2M Domains Nobody Uses

$1 in → $2.92 "revenue" out

The multiplier that turns dead domains into stock price

Original: namesilo.com/invest | Correction: phishdestroy.eth.limo | May 2026

The Business Model — A Digital Car Wash

NEW SLIDE

2

Imagine a car wash that washes 10 cars a day but reports 100. Where does the money for 90 phantom cars come from? Dirty money pushed through the register.

NameSilo is the same car wash. Except instead of cars, it's domains. 4.2 million phantom "washes" that don't exist.

4,221,217Dead domains (81.5%)

$77.3MBooked as "revenue"

$50.8MPaper profit from nothing

2.92x$1 cost → $2.92 revenue

Dead domain "revenue": $77.3M/year

4.2M domains with no website, no traffic, no email, no business identity. NameSilo spends $72,645/day on wholesale fees to registries. Books $211,807/day as revenue. Nobody uses these domains. The purchase IS the purpose.

Alive domain revenue: $17.5M/year

958,188 domains that actually respond to HTTP. Real websites, real businesses, real customers. This is the legitimate business. It's 4.4x smaller than the phantom side.

For investors: Dead domain revenue is 4.4x larger than alive domain revenue. The phantom tail wags the real dog. When NameSilo reports "revenue growth," ask which side grew.

How the Laundering Machine Works — Step by Step

CORRECTED

3

STEP 1: You have $100K in dirty money

STEP 2: Create accounts via PrivacyGuardian
        Each looks like a real client: pw-a7f3b2@privacyguardian.org
        3M+ domains already use PG — yours blend right in

STEP 3: Buy 10,000 .sbs domains at $14.95 = $149,500 "revenue"

STEP 4: Real cost: 10K x $0.68 wholesale + $0.18 ICANN = $8,600

STEP 5: Books show:
        Revenue: $149,500 (from "clients")
        Cost:    $8,600 (registry fees)
        Profit: $140,900 "clean business income"

The "client" is yourself. $149,500 dirty in → $140,900 clean out.

Laundering cost: 4.5%. Standard money laundering rate is 10-30%. NameSilo does it for 4.5% through cheap TLDs. The cheapest laundry in town.

31x.cyou: $0.48 → $14.95

22x.sbs: $0.68 → $14.95

22x.cfd: $0.68 → $14.95

15x.icu: $0.98 → $14.95

The Domain Pyramid — What "5.8M Active" Actually Means

CORRECTED

4

CORRECTED

Layer	Domains	%	Reality
Total "under management"	5,179,405	100%	The investor number
No DNS (never activated)	1,669,111	32.2%	Never existed as a website
Parking stubs	1,710,658	33.0%	Sedo/CF/Shopify defaults
HTTP dead/empty	774,235	15.0%	Resolves but nothing there
HTTP alive (actually responds)	958,188	18.5%	Something exists
Real business (org/company)	54,855	1.06%	Actual identifiable customers
Top-million (has real traffic)	17,875	0.35%	Someone actually visits
Tranco top 10K	58	0.001%	Fifty-eight.

81.5%Dead or empty

99.65%Zero confirmed traffic

58In Tranco top 10K

Question for the board: You claim 5.8M "active" domains. Only 958,188 respond to HTTP (18.5%). Only 58 are in the Tranco top 10K. A regional ISP in Estonia has more top-10K domains than NameSilo. Where is the "growth" going?

Domain Pricing — The "Low Cost Leader" Myth

CORRECTED

5

CORRECTED

NameSilo claims to have "the cheapest domain prices on the Internet." We checked 136 ICANN-accredited registrars across 12 TLDs.

#	.com Registrar	Register	Renew	Notes
1	Spaceship	$2.90	$10.18	5.4x cheaper
6	Namecheap	$6.99	$14.98	2.2x cheaper
14	Dynadot	$8.99	$10.88
23	Porkbun	$10.08	$11.08
26	Cloudflare	$10.46	$10.46	At-cost pricing
... 100+ registrars cheaper than NameSilo ...
~96	NameSilo	$15.56	$17.29	Bottom 30%

Bottom 78%Average across 12 TLDs

19.6x.shop renewal trap ($1.99→$38.99)

1 of 12TLDs where #1 (.club only)

Their comparison page is fraud. NameSilo shows GoDaddy at $23.98 (real price: $5.19, inflated 4.6x), Name.com at $17.99 (real: $11.24, inflated 1.6x). They excluded 107+ cheaper registrars. They advertise "150+ payment options" — we counted 12.

ShortDot Partnership — Follow the Junk TLDs

NEW SLIDE

6

ShortDot SA (Luxembourg) owns .sbs, .cfd, .icu, .cyou, .bond, .buzz, .qpon. NameSilo is 1 of 6 named partners out of 400+. These TLDs dominate the dead domain graveyard.

Event	Date	Significance
ShortDot acquires .sbs from Australian SBS	Apr 2024	IANA ownership transfer
ShortDot acquires .cfd from DotCFD Registry	Apr 2024	IANA ownership transfer
NameSilo dead domain spike	2024	+615% (67K → 485K) — perfectly synchronized
Spike continues	2025	1.5M new, 4,260/day — 732K ShortDot TLDs total

19.8%Of ALL .sbs = NameSilo

<0.2%ShortDot at GoDaddy

55xConcentration anomaly

Who is buying 732K ShortDot domains through NameSilo and never activating them? Both are named partners. Both report "growth." Nobody checks if the domains are real. A captive pipeline, not a market.

The xmrwallet.com Scandal — Why This Matters

NEW SLIDE

7

NameSilo's ICANN-accredited registrar publicly defended a $100M+ Monero theft operation. This is not an allegation — the tweet is archived, the lies are debunked, and the operator posted a farewell letter admitting the investigation forced closure.

Lie #1: "The domain was compromised" — SHA-256 hashes prove code never changed

Lie #2: "No abuse reports received" — 20+ from us alone, 100+ total, delivery receipts on file

Lie #3: Operator was directly involved — emailed us defending his code

Lie #4: Offered to remove VirusTotal detections for a known crypto drainer

Then they used X Gold Checkmark to silence the researchers. X Support: "no violation found." Account still locked. Subscription still billing. 3 other registrars (WebNic, PDR, Key-Systems) suspended the same domains on the same evidence within days.

For investors: Your registrar publicly committed 4 verifiable lies to protect a Russian-linked scam operation. The tweet is archived at GhostArchive (11K views). This creates legal, regulatory, and reputational risk that is not disclosed in any filing.

Ownership & Management — Annotated

ANNOTATED

8

Person	Role	Notable
Paul Andreola	CEO & President	Former investment advisor. Signed off on the 4-lie tweet.
Kristaps Ronka	Director + CEO NameSilo LLC	18.5% owner (~17M shares). Runs the registrar day-to-day. Oversaw 100+ ignored abuse reports.
Natasha Tsai	CFO	CPA, formerly Grant Thornton. Signs financials that count 81.5% dead domains as "active."
Colin Bowkett	Director	CFA, Master of Finance. Should be asking about the 615% dead spike and $50.8M phantom profit.
Paul Kozak	Director	VC partner. Raised $75M+. Invested in a company where 81.5% of the product doesn't exist.
Dan Milic	Director	Co-founder AdParlor ($100M in Facebook ads). Inc "Top 30 under 30." Board member of a registrar protecting a $100M theft operation.

Actual "diversification" strategy:
Domain registrar (81.5% phantom) · SewerVUE ($2.45M, sewer pipes) · Reach Systems (underwater cameras) · Ola Media ($1.6M, Uber screens in Mexico) · ShortURL.at · CommerceHQ · Atlas Engineered · Alchemy Labs · Cheelcare · Allur Group

This is not a tech company. This is a holding company that generates $50.8M/year in phantom profit from dead domains and invests it in sewer pipes and Mexican taxi ads.

10 Questions for the Next Board Meeting

NEW SLIDE

9

1. Who is buying 4,260 dead domains per day and never activating them?

2. Where is the $26.5M/year for dead domains coming from? Show payment records.

3. How many domain purchases were paid in Bitcoin? From which wallets?

4. Why did dead domains spike 615% in 2024, synchronized with ShortDot's TLD acquisitions?

5. Do any bulk-purchase accounts belong to NameSilo employees, officers, or related parties?

6. What percentage of reported C$65.5M revenue is from domains never activated?

7. Why did the company publicly defend a $100M+ theft operation with 4 verifiable lies?

8. Has NameSilo filed any Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with FinCEN?

9. How does a registrar with 5.18M domains have 58 in the Tranco top 10K?

10. When you say "active domains" — what exactly is your definition of "active"?

If the answers don't satisfy you — ask why a company with $50.8M in phantom profit
is buying sewer pipe inspection companies instead of explaining where the money comes from.

The Bottom Line

This is not a tech company.
This is a money laundering machine
that files quarterly earnings.

81.5%

dead domains

$50.8M

phantom profit

4.5%

laundering rate

Full Investigation → 130M Domain Report → Download 5.1M Dataset → Win98 Full Site →

phishdestroy.eth · Permanent IPFS Archive · Ethereum Name Service
Every number sourced. Every claim verifiable. 0 rebuttals received to date.
If anything here is false, prove it. We'll take everything down.

NameSilo Technologies Corp.[CORRECTED EDITION]

The Business Model — A Digital Car Wash

Dead domain "revenue": $77.3M/year

Alive domain revenue: $17.5M/year

How the Laundering Machine Works — Step by Step

The Domain Pyramid — What "5.8M Active" Actually Means

Domain Pricing — The "Low Cost Leader" Myth

ShortDot Partnership — Follow the Junk TLDs

The xmrwallet.com Scandal — Why This Matters

Ownership & Management — Annotated

10 Questions for the Next Board Meeting

This is not a tech company.This is a money laundering machinethat files quarterly earnings.

NameSilo Technologies Corp.
[CORRECTED EDITION]

This is not a tech company.
This is a money laundering machine
that files quarterly earnings.